The rivalry between Android and iOS has been going on for more than a decade, and over time the two platforms have become much closer to each other. Apple has finally embraced customization of the home screen and RCS message, while Google has further improved the privacy and visual polish of the system. However, despite this approach, Android still has several key advantages that the iPhone has not been able to offer to its users even in 2026.
One of the most striking differences is the true split-screen display. For years, Android has been enabling the simultaneous use of two applications, side by side or one above the other, with a flexible border between them. This mode of operation enables true multitasking, such as writing emails and viewing documents in parallel or comparing content between two applications. The iPhone still relies on Picture-in-Picture for video content, which isn’t a full-fledged replacement for running two apps at once.
In which Android still has a clear advantage
Android also stands out for its support for multiple user profiles and guest mode. On one device, it is possible to create completely separate accounts with their own applications, settings and data, as well as a temporary mode that is deleted after use. On iPhone devices, such flexibility does not exist, and the alternatives are limited and impractical for everyday situations.
Another area where Android has an advantage is long, or “scrolling” screenshots. Android offers this systemically in almost all applications, while iOS limits this option to a small number of Apple applications and web browsers. In practice, this means that iPhone users still often have to rely on additional applications or complicated solutions.
Android phones can often also serve as a power source for other devices through wireless battery sharing. This function allows you to charge headphones, smart watches or even another phone without any cable. The iPhone partially responded with wired reverse charging via a USB-C port, but without the wireless flexibility that Android has offered for years.
Finally, Android retains a significant advantage in the freedom to install applications. The ability to install software from alternative sources, such as F-Droid or directly from the manufacturer’s website, allows the use of tools and applications that Apple simply does not allow. This openness brings greater control to users, especially those who appreciate open-source software, advanced tools, and deeper system customization.
All of these differences do not mean that Android is universally better than iOS, nor do they diminish the benefits of the iPhone ecosystem, such as tight device integration and long-term software support. They only confirm that the two platforms still have different philosophies. It is this variety and competition that allows users to choose the system that best suits their habits and needs, writes MUO.